https://tantabus.ai/tags/crackle+cosette
Per Derpi, it should imply g4, queen chrysalis, disguised changeling and have the aliases shutter bug, shutterbug.

Posted 3 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 210

Nocturn

Moderator

Adjutant

@Background Pony #635A

or whether mailpony needs similar implications

Oh, right: mailpony should definitely imply pony.

Agreed. Done.

Why? I guess technically not every mare is a pony (can be a horse for example), but do you think we’ll get non-ponies tagged “mailmare”?

I think I was expecting to see more images of Gabby here, but - yeah, the vast majority (granted, it’s a very small set in any case) is pony. And given that:

mailpony +> pony

Added the implication:

mailmare +> mare, mailpony, pony

Fun fact: Derpi even has a mailgriffon tag.

Agreed. Ah! Found one:

mailgriffon +> griffon

There! Our tags are now officially more set up than Derpi’s (where the set of cases is 1).

Posted 5 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 209

Adusak90

Background pony enjoyer

Male mailmare should be “mailion”

Posted 6 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Creative Corner » Diary of a prompter » Post 1

truekry

Wizzard

reserved

Posted 6 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Creative Corner » Diary of a prompter » Topic Opener

truekry

Wizzard

Foreword

Hello dear readers,
you may ask, what is this? The answer would be “a summary of my personal experiences playing with AI to generate images, so far”. I want to share my experiences, discoveries I made and little tricks I came upon. My main target is to get people new to the topic up to speed, and maybe some old veterans can also learn a thing or two.

That said, English is only my second language. If you see a mistake or a passage of text that is just weird, please tell me and I will correct it. You are also invited to share your own experiences and so on.

The Content

Chapter 1 - What you can see

Lets start with a simple, but powerful one: If you get an idea for an image, just stop and think a moment before you prompt. Why? Lets say you want Fluttershy on a bed. Easy! pony, feral pony, my little pony, close up, fluttershy, indoors, bedroom, on bed, lying on side. Boom! done. And you have a wardrobe between the bed and the wall where realistically is not enough space to fit one. Bummer. But why? The problem here is bedroom, believe it or not. While training a model, pictures of bedrooms are tagged as such and the AI learns the concept of them. What have most bedroom pictures in them? A night stand, wardrobes, maybe some pictures on the wall, etc. You get the idea. Nice of the AI to add it automatically, but if we want a picture of just the bed with a pony on it, as in only part of a room, the AI will still try to add these things. We have two options now to avoid this. We could leave bedroom out and add to the prompt stuff like: wooden wall, window with curtains, pictures OR we prompt stuff out we don’t want as a negative: wardrobe, nightstand with a high enough value.

This is one example of course. Lets say you want to prompt a character only visible from behind. Some one like solo, pony, feral pony, bat pony, rear view, grey fur, spread bat wings, yellow eyes, blue mane. This will most likely result in a bat pony seen at an angle from behind or a pony looking over their shoulder. This time yellow eyes are the culprit. The AI will always try to put into a pic what you prompt. If you want the pony to look away from the viewer, you can add looking away with a high value, but it would be way easier to just leave the eyes out.

And this is what I mean. Put only stuff in the prompt of what you wish to be in the picture and mind “implications”. xy-room and so on always result in some implications for example. So stop a moment and think what truly should be visible in your scenario. And now the curve ball and my favorite example: castle bedroom

If you have been paying attention you know what could happen here. We get a luxurious room with stone wall, a big window and outside of it? A castle! Go figure. AI will generate what you give it and castle was definitely in there. luxurious bedroom would be a good alternative to use here for example. A trick that sometimes seems to work, depending on the model, is using “-” or “_”. Like castle_bedroom. It no cure it all but it helps. Same principle, different example for this: Lets say you want Sweetie Belle without her cutie mark. You put cutie mark in the negative but is still doesn’t work? The term blank flank is an option but you probably guessed it: cutiemark, cutie_mark, cutie-mark. To give the curve ball a curve ball, different models used different tags in training. A “Applejack” or “Apple Jack” kind of scenario. Good luck finding that out.

Chapter 2 - The Power of Paint

In chapter 1 we talked about prompting, but sometimes a prompt can get you only so far. AI can’t get new concepts without being retrained, so we as end users have to make do until a new version is out that knows the concept. Like a character from a recent anime. Sure, Loras as little DLCs help us over until PonyV8 - Electric Boogaloo comes out and can generate the whole universe at once, but using too much of them is like Skyrim modding. It gets even more unstable really fast. So normally you want as less Loras as possible. Inpainting is a really powerful tool that not many people seem to use, so here a quick example to make my point:

The picture you see on the left? I turned something like that into the right one. You still don’t need any artistic skills, just a general idea of what you want. I used a simple “technique” called blobbing. And it is as dumb as it sounds. Just open Paint (or any other digital drawing application), set it to the resolution you want and just drop in simple blobs until they “loosely” resemble your idea. Then write the matching prompt and denoise your “sketch” at 0.75 to like 0.9 (so its nearly gone). It will then work as a “guidance” for the AI.

I used the same technique here, just I drew into the generated image, then masked the area out and let it redraw only that part. This was at one point, only a one pony picture. (1 cookie if you can tell which one was the original.)

Interlude

Something you need to be aware of in general is prompt “bleed”. Let say you want a picture with Twilight Sparkle taking a sun bath. Most likely the result will be a dusk picture. The problem is Twilight. As in chapter 1 mentioned, the AI will take what is there. It takes the Twilight as base to make a dusk setting, like the castle example. Its a general issue most models have. Fern, from the popular anime, is a good second example. If I generate her, I also get a lot of fern, the plant. (Frieren and Fern are actually German words and mean “freezing” and “distance” respectively. Japanese love to take german words in their fantasy writing.)

This can be countered by adding the daytime we don’t want in the negative or fern plant in the other case. Just another thing to look out for in general.

Chapter 3 - Fantasy is Dead

So far, I talked about having a general idea, or that you have a picture in mind. What if you don’t? What if you just have the basic need of: “Need cute pone pictures”? This chapter is for you when you don’t get why grown men get exited over some sticks on the internet. Jokes aside, sometimes we have just a vague inkling or are just bored. That’s what the cfg-scale is for. Most models give users a range like 3-7 but what does this actually do? Its basically just a scale how “obedient” the AI is to your prompt. The higher the scale, the less it does on its own. Think like the bleed thing I talked about, just on purpose. This also means part of your prompt will be ignored more likely. I bet you generated a pony before and said yellow mane, blue eyes and got the exact opposite. That could be a too low cfg. I personally consider 3 the lowest, regardless of model. The highest I ever used was 11 back in the SD1.5 days. For SDXL (that includes pony, illustrious, Noob, etc…) it is around 7 to 8. While it can go up to 20, you will never be happy with those results, trust me bro.

So now that we established that we are unimaginative bellends, can we still make pictures? Yes, that what AI is for after all. You want to go with a very simple prompt for this, like solo, pony, feral pony, unicorn, twilight sparkle, lying in tall grass and a cfg at 3 (don’t forget the usual quality words). And hit run. That’s it. This is the monkey with typewriter approach to generation. Generate random number of pictures, eventually one will be Hamlet.

For the second one, I left the grass part out. But as you can see, we still get pictures with absolute minimal input and let the computer do most of the work. (Or maybe even more as it already does.)

I personally only use this approach if I am absolutely out of ideas. Sometimes I struck gold, sometimes something in the results gives me an idea and I prompt with more purpose (4-6 cfg). But this is what most AI haters think is to “good AI pictures”. The downside of this they are somewhat right. These picture will most likely be bland and simple. But, what if could spice this up? What if… Lora? And here comes the fun part; Throw Loras for special effects at this gives often very interesting results.

Chapter 4 - Fusion

Lets go from simple to complicated. Or to be more precise, detailed. Detailed backgrounds are difficult in a sense that AI has no concept of depth, space and consistency. That’s why you have two beds in bedroom, or five hundred lamps and so on. The AI doesn’t remember what it put in, it just guesses what should be there. And its biggest enemy? Characters. They disrupt the generation and it starts new between the legs, or the right side looks different from the left cause the character splits the picture in half. That’s why most backgrounds “suck” in generated images. But there is a way around it, and all you need is a free image editing tool (Gimp, Krita, Photopea, etc…) and 10-20 minutes extra of your time.

And now hold onto your horses because the trick is; We generate background and character separately. I know, mind blown, take a minute to come back into reality, I will wait. But jokes aside, its not as hard as it sounds. We need 3 prompts for this little stunt. One for the character, one for the background and one that is the combination of the two. Then we get to generating. For the character, just look for a fitting angle and that it has the pose you want. We ignore the background here. (Also lighting and so on.)

If we have what we want, we generate the background. Prompts like no human, scenery, wide shot are our friends here. Here you set the mood and tone. Night time, day time, stuff like that. AI is good at just generating background, since there is no interruption by unshapely creatures.

Now come the human part, aka you. If we have both pictures we want to “marry”, we open the character in our editing tool of choice and use the lasso tool. Just cut her out like Sunset did Twilight in the Equestria Girls move. It doesn’t need to be pixel perfect or anything. Then open the background and slap that bad boy in. Play a little with size, angle, lighting and stuff if you want to (and know how), then save the image and your part is done.

Remember chapter 2? Well we do that now, just with a really low denoise around 0.3 to 0.4 this time and our combined third prompt. Inpainting will clean up our sloppy mess and make it fit together. And if not on the first try, do it again, like at 0.2 to 0.3 this time. And then, we have a picture with detailed background (that makes sense) and a character or two in it. Or TLDR: Photobashing is still a thing.

Chapter 5 - Let it be Light_

Lighting can have a huge impact on any given scene, regardless if it is film or picture. This is also true for AI generated images. There are various forms of lighting, but I will keep it down to the most used ones. I learned about this stuff when I started to get into AI and it can help to make a picture better. But what do I mean by “lighting”? imagine you want to take a picture of your friends at an outing. If they are facing the sun, they are properly lighted, but will squint their eyes to shield them. If they face away, chanced are there isn’t enough light for a good picture, especially with a smartphone camera. So you stand them in an angle to the sun, so they don’t look directly at the sun, but get enough light to make the picture. And now remember, we can control the sun in this case. And we do it by the right prompts:

natural lighting
Uses sunlight or ambient light from the environment.

dramatic lighting
Creates strong contrast between light and shadow.

cinematic lighting
Mimics film lighting with controlled shadows and highlights.

soft lighting
Diffused and even light with gentle shadows.

hard lighting
Sharp, strong light that creates crisp shadows.

rim lighting
Creates a border of light around edges or persons.

volumetric lighting
Also known as light rays or god rays.

_{Thanks to ChatGPT for the short descriptions of the different techniques}

There are more, of course, but these are the most common ones. If you want an outdoor scene, go for natural. If you have an action scene, dramatic or cinematic, and so on. The right light makes a big difference and the AI knows these terms.
You can go further into detail. Lets say we have a pony walking through a forest on a warm summer day. Our prompt could look like this:

solo, pony, feral pony, full body, unicorn, rarity, walking towards viewer, outdoors, forest, tall grass, natural lighting, volumetric lighting, dappled sunlight, thick leaf canopy

Chapter 6 - Designing a prompt_

We have come so far, learned some basic techniques and even some “pro haxxor moves”. Now its time to talk about the absolute basics. There are people making money with “prompt design” and I never heard anything more silly. Its not a science, just basic logic and a little bit of knowledge how AI works. Here is a basic graphic how it works in our case. _{(Source @Witty-Designer7316)}

The first info we need is the base model we are using. Lets say our model is named “Prefect Pony XL”. The name gives it away but the description on civitai also states it is based on ponyv6. So it should take the same “quality words” as ponyv6. And after a quick check on the sample images, yes it does. So now we can putting our prompt together:

The most important rule is, the more important something is, the further at the beginning of the prompt it should be. That’s why quality words come first. So, depending on the model our first words should look something like this:
score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality

The next thing should be what we want. Lets say we want Fluttershy with spread wings standing in a lake.
So something like: solo, pony, feral pony, full body, pegasus, Fluttershy, spread wings, partly submerged, wet fur

Now the background: outdoors, forest, lake, tall grass, flowers

And at last, additional stuff like lighting and stuff: natural lighting, dappled sunlight, dusk

This gives us a final prompt:

score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, solo, pony, feral pony, full body, pegasus, Fluttershy, spread wings, partly submerged, wet fur, outdoors, forest, lake, tall grass, flowers, natural lighting, dappled sunlight, dusk

But we are not done. Now we come to weights! The make it possible to make parts of the prompt more important than others, to control how much of what we want. The program I use takes “+” and “-” as weights, so for me it would look something like this:

score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, solo, pony, feral pony, (full body)-, pegasus, Fluttershy, spread wings, partly submerged, (wet fur)+, outdoors, forest, lake, tall grass, (flowers)-, natural lighting, (dappled sunlight, dusk)++

Most others programs use a syntax like this:

score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, solo, pony, feral pony, (full body:0.8), pegasus, Fluttershy, spread wings, partly submerged, (wet fur:1.2), outdoors, forest, lake, tall grass, (flowers:0.8), natural lighting, (dappled sunlight:1.5), (dusk:1.5)

BUT WAIT, THERE IS MORE!

This is of course only 50% of what we need. We still need to tell the AI what we don’t want. So first we check the base model page again and get the default negative prompt quality words: score_4,score_3,score_2,score_1

Then the model site of our merge Perfect Pony XL: ugly, worst quality, bad quality, jpeg artifacts

And normally that would be enough, but I will add a few personal favorite of mine today:
long body, realistic, monochrome, greyscale, artist name, signature, watermark

Giving us the final negative prompt:

score_4,score_3,score_2,score_1, ugly, worst quality, bad quality, jpeg artifacts, long body, realistic, monochrome, greyscale, artist name, signature, watermark

We could add weights here too, but we should try first for now (I use tpony here, another ponyv6 based model):
large

Okay, the general idea is there, but not quite right. And now the hard truth, ponyv6 is a little outdated as is the tpony model I used here. So I exchanged the quality words to fit a popular illustrious model and got this:
large

Better, but still off. I want Fluttershy to look at the viewer so we add looking at viewer and try again. Or better you can try. Happy prompting!

Interlude

We already talked about photo editing software. Another thing you can do that doesn’t require learning or skill is making small edits with the “band-aid-tool”. It is a tool that looks around a marked area and tries to guess the content of said area. I made a video of this on action a little while ago where I use it to remove ghost signatures:

That said, it can do far more than just that. I find it way easier to remove smaller mistakes the same way. Knowing your tools and the options they provide is a valuable skill on its own, so try around!

To be continued…

Posted 6 days ago Report
Edited 2 days ago because: Chapter 6 added

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 208

Background Pony #635A

@Nocturn

I think that mailpony isn’t a good implication for that one, but agree mare is.

Why? I guess technically not every mare is a pony (can be a horse for example), but do you think we’ll get non-ponies tagged “mailmare”?

mail… stallion?

Derpi has poststallion with 2 images. I think most of the time mail-carrying stallions are simply tagged “mailpony, stallion”.

Should mailmare only apply for Derpy?

Mailmare is not specific to Derpy, see mailmare AND NOT derpy hooves on Derpibooru.

I’m not sure if I should also be implying any of the other mail tags like mailmare hat, mailmare uniform, mailpony uniform

I don’t think so. For example, post office saddlebag and a letter in mouth clearly indicates a mailmare without any uniform.

or whether mailpony needs similar implications

Oh, right: mailpony should definitely imply pony.

If we had a generic tag for a person carrying mail, mailmare and mailpony should probably imply it. Derpibooru has mail carrier, mailman, mailwoman, postman. I think mail carrier looks most promising, but I think it’s best to bring this issue on Derpibooru, let them handle it and then use the solution they end up with.

Fun fact: Derpi even has a mailgriffon tag.

Posted 7 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 20

Nocturn

Moderator

Adjutant

@CCDrop
I think you misunderstand some of what I tried to say - I do not think there’s much of anything in My Little Pony that is anatomically correct. It’s a cartoon where horses can touch their noses with the bottoms of their hooves. So I think debating correct is too subjective to have any meaning - it’s all a matter of personal taste. Arguably the most anatomically correct images on the site are at best not what people are looking for, or at worst are openly reviled, because they end up looking like the old world style paintings of stallions behind grandpa’s sofa.

In MLP the only thing that is correct is in the show bible - and even the show only used it when it was useful. It’s guidelines - not laws.

If you want to create a new tag because there’s something you want to find, and there’s no tag for it, figure out what such a new tag would be called and please propose it. Then if there is consensus, and you find images are missing the new tag, add the tag.

That way you’re making the positive case easier to find, instead of trying to force a negative case on everyone else, that you could avoid simply by watching artists and prompters who create what you like.

Or, you know, the whole ‘just ignore things you don’t like’.

Anyway, I’m officially out. Which means I’ll never actually check back on the thread.

Well, ok then. Nevermind, I guess.

Posted 7 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 19

CCDrop

@Nocturn

Alright I get the picture I’ll skedaddle and spend my time doing other things. I’m not here to argue. Though since that seems to be what people are doing to me I’ll go ahead and end with one last argue comment before I go back to just lurking through tags and dadding to my image collection like normal:

@Nocturn

Those are not mastectomy. If anything, those are show accurate. Ponies in the show do not have visible mammies.

Show accurate doesn’t have sex organs of any kind either. As soon as you sexualize them and especially bring them into the world of “anatomically incorrect” the number of mammals that don’t have mammies are low… It’s literally in the name—but since I’m not a biologist I’ll outsource the answer to an AI [Which I feel is especially appropriate given the content of the website we’re on.] or two… and the results are:

“All mammals have mammary glands—this is the defining trait of the class Mammalia and the origin of the name itself. There are no known species of mammals that completely lack mammary glands.”

So unless we are also going to say because they’re magical they are not mammalia even though they are ponies this argument falls entirely flat.

Anyway, I’m officially out. Which means I’ll never actually check back on the thread. So no need to reply any further. I’m a low-stress type I can’t handle these kind of debates, especially since I’m just out looking at pony porn which is my #1 relaxation hobby so definitely don’t want to turn that stressful that’s why I have filtration tags to filter out stressful content.

Happy tagging, and thanks for tagging what you do!
Also since most of you are admin and this is probably the only conversational we’ll ever have since I’m not the commenting type: Thanks for the website too! I’ve been lurking around Derpy since it was launched took a month off from pony porn came back and was like “Man AI pony went out of style fast, the post rate feels almost non existent now.” Took me months to figure out that most of it got exiled and found a new home here since I’m not a forums/commenting type. XD

Posted 7 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 207

Nocturn

Moderator

Adjutant

@Background Pony #635A
I think that mailpony isn’t a good implication for that one, but agree mare is.

mailpony makes me confused though - it seems the hierarchy might be:

mailpony
- mailmare
- mail ... stallion? - no, that doesn’t exist … here at least. But we do have care package …

Should mailmare only apply for Derpy? Like - is mailmare just a Derpy thing? hmm .. ok, looking at the mail tags, I don’t have enough data to process how to wrangle it.

Ugh. I’m clearly overthinking this. I added mailpony and mare as implications to mailmare, but I’m not sure if I should also be implying any of the other mail tags like mailmare hat, mailmare uniform, mailpony uniform … or whether mailpony needs similar implications … I think unless someone can describe how this could all be wrapped up I’m going to look at how other sites populate this tag.

Posted 8 days ago Report
Edited 8 days ago because: formatting is hard sometimes

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 18

Nocturn

Moderator

Adjutant

Excuse me if I am simply reiterating what @LightningBolt has already said, but …

@CCDrop

What I want to filter out are images like these: [images clearly depicting mastectomy]
https://tantabus.ai/images/51534?q=twilight+sparkle%2C+explicit
https://tantabus.ai/images/50712?q=twilight+sparkle%2C+explicit

Those are not mastectomy. If anything, those are show accurate. Ponies in the show do not have visible mammies.

@CCDrop

I’m trying to volunteer to tag something I feel is important

That’s wonderful! Thank you for being willing to volunteer to do something you think is important.

But - what you’re proposing is not important to others.

And right now you seem to be working for the negative case instead of the positive. You are trying to tag your “do not want” instead of finding a way to tag the “what you do want”.

The negative case of what you are trying to tag (images that don’t show crotchboobs the way you want) is ENORMOUS. The positive case (images that do show crotchboobs the way you want) is much smaller.

So work on the positive case instead.

Please consider instead identifying those prompters and artists who are creating the kinds of crotchboobs you prefer and either use a custom hide filter to hide everything else, or create a custom watch list for only those prompters/artists making the art you like.

And maybe present examples of those “what you want” images and propose a tag for those - for the positive case - instead of tarring every other image on the site which you self-describe as being a ‘politically incorrect’ tag.

I wouldn’t figure it would be something that normal posters would use nor one that would suddenly start being used by a ton of people

Case in point - you admit that ‘normal users’ wouldn’t use it. But to work as a ‘not what I want’ tag for your filter, you’d need everyone else uploading images to become aware of it, and have the same opinion about what constitutes your idea of what “right crotch anatomy for mares” is as you are.

If you have an ideal of what “right crotch anatomy for mares” is, then think of a name for that tag, find some examples, and … I don’t know - if I were doing this I would:

Create a gallery with those images.
Come up with a really good name for that tag.
Propose the new tag in a new thread so that it can be discussed, evolved, and maybe gain support.

And - most importantly:

Use that gallery to figure out who my favorite creators are and make a watchlist for them.

Posted 8 days ago Report
Edited 8 days ago

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 206

Background Pony #635A

Mailmare should imply mailpony, mare.

Posted 8 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 17

CCDrop

@CCDrop

I wouldn’t figure it would be something that normal posters would use nor one that would suddenly start being used by a ton of people; as you said people barely even tag basic stuff as is. But I also wasn’t asking other people to tag things, I’m trying to volunteer to tag something I feel is important. Just need to know what to tag it as. My whole thing is that since I’m already looking through a massive amount of images, and I’m watch new posts, and there’s something I’d personally like to filter but can’t, and other people have told me they would like to filter by it too, it then just seems logical that I should try and volunteer to tag it, but I want to tag it as the most politically correct thing.

Looking on Derp quite a lot of images like the ones I want to tag are tagged anatomically incorrect, and that is usually the argument that I hear as to why people don’t like it, but while using that tag would make the most logical sense from a pre-established point of view, it also just feels like fueling a needless fire—and since it’s also not consistently used either, if I’m going to invest a couple of hundred hours of time building up a tag to mean something for people I’d like it to be more meaningful and less needlessly dramatic as anatomically incorrect tag would be.

Posted 8 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 16

LightningBolt

Administrator

ADHD fueled

@CCDrop
Udders not being drawn on ponies =/= masectomy. There is no need for a tag for a lack of them drawn on solely for the sake of filtering. Tags should be two-sided, searching and filtering, and your case only seems to be that you (and presumably a few other people) do not want to see them. Do you know how hard it is to already get people to tag what tags already exist? Even by a logistical standpoint it doesn’t sound worth it.

Posted 8 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 15

CCDrop

@LightningBolt

I already have my own system overall. I’m mostly here trying to talk about the idea of making a new tag largely for other people. Since really mastectomy content is kind of off putting, and IRL I’ve talked to quite a few pony porn fans who find it really creepy and wished there was a way to filter it.

So since I’m basically binge going through Tantabus anyway since I learned about it late, it would be a perfect time for me to binge tag stuff for other people if something was decided on.

Posted 8 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 14

LightningBolt

Administrator

ADHD fueled

@CCDrop
You can hide individual images you don’t like and you should do that as there will not be a new tag created just for you that we can not expect other people to know about or use.

Posted 8 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 13

CCDrop

@Nocturn
Yeah that was my thoughts too, anatomically incorrect just doesn’t feel right—especially in the context of AI artwork where it takes on an whole different meaning. XD

Examples of why simply looking for images that have crotchboobs don’t work:

If I’m looking for Twilight Sparkle I want to be able to find: [things where you can’t see crotchboobs but you can either safely assume they exist OR they don’t need to be there because we’re talking about human twilight or gender swapped twilight.]
https://tantabus.ai/images/44763?q=my%3Afaves%2C+twilight+sparkle
https://tantabus.ai/images/45211?q=my%3Afaves%2C+twilight+sparkle
https://tantabus.ai/images/45651?q=my%3Afaves%2C+twilight+sparkle
https://tantabus.ai/images/44091?q=my%3Afaves%2C+twilight+sparkle
https://tantabus.ai/images/38068?q=my%3Afaves%2C+twilight+sparkle
https://tantabus.ai/images/38272?q=my%3Afaves%2C+twilight+sparkle

And even things like this: [showlistic plot where there are no sexualizaion/sexual organs on display anyway, you can safely just put this under the mental category of all equipment is there just censored.]
https://tantabus.ai/images/51731?q=twilight+sparkle%2C+safe
https://tantabus.ai/images/41719?q=twilight+sparkle%2C+safe%2C+plot
https://tantabus.ai/images/22202?q=twilight+sparkle%2C+safe%2C+plot

What I want to filter out are images like these: [images clearly depicting mastectomy]
https://tantabus.ai/images/51534?q=twilight+sparkle%2C+explicit
https://tantabus.ai/images/50712?q=twilight+sparkle%2C+explicit

Posted 8 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 12

Nocturn

Moderator

Adjutant

@CCDrop

I feel like on a politically correct side it would be to start tagging them all as anatomically incorrect but also looking at the content of that tag…

Please do not use that tag for characters that are, technically speaking, “on book” for the show. I think it’s wrong to have one group tagging things as anatomically incorrect if they don’t match IRL horses, and another tagging things as anatomically incorrect if they look like they do in the show. Makes the tag utterly useless because it’s meaning becomes simply “Me No Like This!”

@CCDrop
Can you please provide an example of an image that you want to find, but that does not have crotchboobs, so I can see what is preventing -crotchboobs from doing what you want?

Posted 9 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 205

𝓐𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓭𝓸𝓰𝔃

Moderator

T_T

@FrostRU
done

Posted 10 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 204

FrostRU

Mares for masses!

https://tantabus.ai/tags/countess+coloratura should imply https://tantabus.ai/tags/coloratura

Posted 10 days ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Default search

If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.

Allowed fields

Field Selector	Type	Description	Example
`author`	Literal	Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term.	`author:Joey`
`body`	Full Text	Matches the body of this post. This is the default field.	`body:test`
`created_at`	Date/Time Range	Matches the creation time of this post.	`created_at:2015`
`id`	Numeric Range	Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post.	`id:1000000`
`my`	Meta	`my:posts` matches posts you have posted if you are signed in.	`my:posts`
`subject`	Full Text	Matches the title of the topic.	`subject:time wasting thread`
`topic_id`	Literal	Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to.	`topic_id:7000`
`topic_position`	Numeric Range	Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0.	`topic_position:0`
`updated_at`	Date/Time Range	Matches the creation or last edit time of this post.	`updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago`
`user_id`	Literal	Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term.	`user_id:211190`
`forum`	Literal	Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to.	`forum:meta`