Posts

OC:Laoguang (Pony V6):
https://civitai.com/models/2537133/oc-laoguang?modelVersionId=2851387

@Background Pony #8BB7
Yeah, keep going.

@Background Pony #936E
I think this is the applejack pic you’re thinking of.

@Background Pony #93F7
Not really. It would still dump pics with errors or lacking in general quality onto the site. With AI, you take the factor time nearly out of the equation. Normally an artist can maybe publish one full pic (colored, shaded, the whole 9 yards) once a week (depending on time they have to work on it). I can get a pic up to snuff in a few hours. Professionals, people with art skills and a decent setup, probably even faster. So art limited itself in the past, by taking time. Quality = Time, but not with AI.

I say for AI this limit should be Quality. I don’t mean is it good artistic, but it is free of errors, are the details clear and so on. Stuff you can measure, since “art” is subjective. Yes, you can’t force people to stick to these standards, but you can say: “If that is what you want to publish, do it somewhere else.” There is a reason why most other sites have strict rules and upload limits.

@Meta_Void
MLP is all about characters. People care about them.

That’s just a pony transforming into a timberwolf. This concept was done many times. Would get more upvotes if it had some story, not just a transformation sequence.

Not bad, but not super interesting either. It’s just a fight and not a very dynamic looking one.

This is notable mostly for its technical merit.

That’s a reasonably good OC design. It doesn’t show any character traits though. Not to mention people care about ponies more than they do about dragons.

Good idea, execution could be better. Square books, text artifacts… I still upvoted it though.

Should I go on?

There was an image of Applejack as a two legged creature, here or on Derpi. I found it funny. I can’t find it now.

The glitches that have their own redraws are honorable mentions:

@truekry
If Philomena had a feature for image sets, it would partially solve this problem (as well as the problem of regular artists posting one image with multiple different variations).

@Background Pony #356F
Matched the implications with Derpi.

@someguy845
Done.

Nipple ring dress should imply nipples, nipple rings, breasts, and dress

Merge eye shadow and eyeshadow

@Heat Sink
BUG REPORT:
When the upload form pre-fills some tags, for example username from Twitter, it still prefills it as prompter: instead of the new creator:. Also, the tag prompter needed should change to creator needed or creator name needed.

Mystery Mint should have a character tag and should imply g4.

Huh, why not the anal slut one?

@Bendy and Boney
Then what will happen to alias requests? Will a mod go through this thread to work only on alias requests or should we save them for until you can handle aliases?

@tyto4tme4l
Derpi also has holding something and so do we: holding something.

Only made it imply coco pommel as it does on Derpi.

“Holding object” should probably be aliased to “holding”.

https://tantabus.ai/tags/holding+object
https://tantabus.ai/tags/holding

I think a tag hoers should have a description. It is for realistic shaped ponies, right? It shouldn’t be used for actual horses.

@Bendy and Boney
Thanks! I don’t know how it looks like from your side. I’ll try to remember to link implications as well.

“:p” should imply “tongue out” and have these aliases:
bleping, blep, blepping, =p, bleb

https://tantabus.ai/tags/-colon-p
https://tantabus.ai/tags/tongue+out
https://tantabus.ai/tags/blep

I have been trying to keep up with and honor these requests for fixes since I became an assistant here (and sometimes I look out for tags needing fixing on my own), but I have forgotten to update the people here. Sorry. I’m going to try to reply to requests from now on.

One thing to keep in mind is that I cannot (yet) merge/alias tags, but I can add implications and change their type (e.g. character, species, etc)

@tyto4tme4l
All of those tags that exist have tack implications now.

I had to manually look up each of them and add the implication, so next time it would be helpful for me (and other staff) if you linked each tag you want to have implications.

“Tack” should be implied by:
blinders, breeching, breeding hobble, bridle, crupper, halter, saddle, tail brace

On grass simply means that character is located on grass, but it doesn’t say whether the character is prone, standing, sitting, walking, etc.

Destiny (g5) should be marked as character tag.

shooting star (main tag) = falling star

On Derpi, leaves is separate from leaf and IMO it makes sense. One leaf as an item is different from, let’s say, falling autumn leaves.

smirking at you should imply looking at you, smirk (possibly also smiling at you, smiling)

beanie (main tag) = beanie hat

I asked if the character in the background of the last part of this was an older Spyro the Dragon so I could add the tag if appropriate.

Prompter replied that with AI even the prompter can’t be sure of such things, but that they preferred to think it was a different Dragon. I responded by tagging it “Schrodinger’s Character” and “Schrodinger’s Spyro”. Are either or both of these good tags to have? Should the first one be an alias of or to an “ambiguous character” tag which is probably easier to remember and definitely easier to spell, but not nearly as evocative.