Posts

For more information, see the search syntax documentation. Search results are sorted by creation date.

Search Results

Site and Policy » Question about policy and uploading my previous fimfiction.net cover images to this site. » Post 4

Site and Policy » Question about policy and uploading my previous fimfiction.net cover images to this site. » Post 3

Site and Policy » Question about policy and uploading my previous fimfiction.net cover images to this site. » Post 2

Site and Policy » Question about policy and uploading my previous fimfiction.net cover images to this site. » Post 1

Update: I THINK I have one cautious ‘solution’ that could work…
That is…if some of my cover images are ‘good enough quality for this site,’ (like this one https://tantabus.ai/images/75251) and some of the images are not so good quality, representing rather primitive and imperfect generative AI output…
I guess I can post the good ones indvidually, and to represent THE ENTIRE SET of the cover images I can make a single collage of all of them, maybe with the good images bigger?
I still appreciate any advice, though.
Thanks!

Site and Policy » Question about policy and uploading my previous fimfiction.net cover images to this site. » Topic Opener

So, I have stories on fimfiction.net, about ten or twelve of which have generative AI cover images. For most of those images, I prompted the generative AIs myself and did any cleanup myself. The exception is an image that a friend used AI to make.
I might replace the stories’ cover images, and I am interested in archiving copies of the (old/replaced) cover images HERE.
IS this considered an (in)appropriate use of this site? Some of these ten or twelve images DO show signs of having been made with, shall we say, ‘past generations of generative technology.’ SOME OTHER images look good, imho.
Maybe the prettiest image, imho, is the cover image on (please forgive me for linking to the story) https://www.fimfiction.net/story/562268/fight-to-the-fin-ish-ultimate-extreme-paternity-battle-with-magic
I truly feel bad about deleting that one, because imho it’s an interesting example of what past versions of Pony Diffusion have been able to do.
I could link to more examples, but I don’t know how much linking I can do before maybe someone complains. I am very new to this site! I am only creating an account so I can refer people to here to see the old cover images (images which at least a few people seemed to enjoy.)
So…is this probably ok? Do you need more information? Should I expect some of the images to be deleted? ;_;
Anyway, thank you for any useful information and advice you can share!

Site and Policy » Featured Image » Post 6

Site and Policy » Featured Image » Post 5

Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 206

Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 205

Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 204

Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 203

Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 202

Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 201

Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 200

Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 199

Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 198

Background Pony #A06F
I didn’t get an e-mail confirmation on my Gmail when I registered. Please help.
Posted Report

Site and Policy » [Extension] Tantabus Tagging Assistant » Post 5

Site and Policy » New name for the combined Artist+Prompter tag. » Post 22

Site and Policy » New name for the combined Artist+Prompter tag. » Post 21

foalClopr

Designated Filly Handler
id prefer the booru standard of artist but i don’t think they like the idea of dealing the potential upset antis. prompter is stupid because it only implies prompting and not any of the other work done. otherwise by: would be best. as it is the most neutral, doesn’t degrade and doesn’t sound tacky.

Site and Policy » New name for the combined Artist+Prompter tag. » Post 20

Lunar Blaze

UNICORN
I’m fine with creator but I also believe we should just be tagging ourselves as artist. The world already has enough disrespect for what we do, I don’t see why we need join in.
I juggle 4-5 models on a single txt2img pass. With the same I prompt I can range anywhere from show accurate to photorealism by deciding which models to use, which model does what, and tweaking denoise ratios.
Might also be a good idea to remember the ai generated, ai assisted, and ai composition tags. I usually tag my stuff with ai generated but that’s really just a technicality because reForge is automating all the inpainting.
Agree, artist: really makes the most sense. We don’t need to validate the anti- ideas about AI art not being art.

Site and Policy » [Extension] Tantabus Tagging Assistant » Post 4

Site and Policy » [Extension] Tantabus Tagging Assistant » Post 3

tyto4tme4l

Something of an artist
I’ve tested it out, works pretty well. However, I would like to have an ability to quickly add my saved tags to images during image upload and tag editing processes.

Site and Policy » [Extension] Tantabus Tagging Assistant » Post 2

Site and Policy » New name for the combined Artist+Prompter tag. » Post 19

JasminDreasond

Tiny Jasmini 🍮
i don’t know what to answer, I put on Gemini to see his opinion to help me think and returned it:
Creator: It’s incredibly universal and inclusive. Whether someone is physically drawing an image from scratch or carefully crafting a prompt to generate it, they are bringing a new concept to life. It respects both traditional and AI workflows without alienating either side.

Prompter: This feels entirely specific to AI. If a traditional artist posts their work, being labeled just a "prompter" might feel dismissive of their manual effort.

Director: This sounds a bit too cinematic, hahaha. While it accurately describes guiding an AI, it implies managing a team or a movie set rather than crafting a standalone image.

Producer: Similar to Director, it feels a little too industrial or business-focused.

By: It's straightforward, but maybe a little too vague for a structured database or image board. Creator: [Name] looks much cleaner and more professional in a tag list than By: [Name].

If you wanted to look completely outside the list, Author: could also work, but Creator: still feels like the most natural and respectful choice for visual media. It sits perfectly alongside the Editor: tag, too!
This context helped me to think better on the subject, and my conclusion that I had is that “Creator” seems more interesting.
It demonstrates that although you have used AI, the use was to create something new, and not to generate an image without any creative way. The idea is to highlight: I used AI to create this project that represents something much deeper from my ideas.

Site and Policy » [Extension] Tantabus Tagging Assistant » Post 1

Default search

If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.

Allowed fields

Field SelectorTypeDescriptionExample
authorLiteralMatches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term.author:Joey
bodyFull TextMatches the body of this post. This is the default field.body:test
created_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation time of this post.created_at:2015
idNumeric RangeMatches the numeric surrogate key for this post.id:1000000
myMetamy:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. my:posts
subjectFull TextMatches the title of the topic.subject:time wasting thread
topic_idLiteralMatches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to.topic_id:7000
topic_positionNumeric RangeMatches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0.topic_position:0
updated_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation or last edit time of this post.updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago
user_idLiteralMatches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term.user_id:211190
forumLiteralMatches the short name for the forum this post belongs to.forum:meta