Thank you! I found this advice helpful and am using it.
Posts
Search Results
Site and Policy » Question about policy and uploading my previous fimfiction.net cover images to this site. » Post 4
Site and Policy » Question about policy and uploading my previous fimfiction.net cover images to this site. » Post 3
(This was a mispost, a reply-to wrong message, and I tried to erase it. Corrected post below.)
Site and Policy » Question about policy and uploading my previous fimfiction.net cover images to this site. » Post 2
you can upload the earlier stuff here
old jank ai stuff is allowed to be jankier than newer stuff
just tag it with
old jank ai stuff is allowed to be jankier than newer stuff
just tag it with
generation errorsSite and Policy » Question about policy and uploading my previous fimfiction.net cover images to this site. » Post 1
Update: I THINK I have one cautious ‘solution’ that could work…
That is…if some of my cover images are ‘good enough quality for this site,’ (like this one https://tantabus.ai/images/75251) and some of the images are not so good quality, representing rather primitive and imperfect generative AI output…
I guess I can post the good ones indvidually, and to represent THE ENTIRE SET of the cover images I can make a single collage of all of them, maybe with the good images bigger?
I still appreciate any advice, though.
Thanks!
Site and Policy » Question about policy and uploading my previous fimfiction.net cover images to this site. » Topic Opener
So, I have stories on fimfiction.net, about ten or twelve of which have generative AI cover images. For most of those images, I prompted the generative AIs myself and did any cleanup myself. The exception is an image that a friend used AI to make.
I might replace the stories’ cover images, and I am interested in archiving copies of the (old/replaced) cover images HERE.
IS this considered an (in)appropriate use of this site? Some of these ten or twelve images DO show signs of having been made with, shall we say, ‘past generations of generative technology.’ SOME OTHER images look good, imho.
Maybe the prettiest image, imho, is the cover image on (please forgive me for linking to the story) https://www.fimfiction.net/story/562268/fight-to-the-fin-ish-ultimate-extreme-paternity-battle-with-magic
I truly feel bad about deleting that one, because imho it’s an interesting example of what past versions of Pony Diffusion have been able to do.
I truly feel bad about deleting that one, because imho it’s an interesting example of what past versions of Pony Diffusion have been able to do.
I could link to more examples, but I don’t know how much linking I can do before maybe someone complains. I am very new to this site! I am only creating an account so I can refer people to here to see the old cover images (images which at least a few people seemed to enjoy.)
So…is this probably ok? Do you need more information? Should I expect some of the images to be deleted? ;_;
Anyway, thank you for any useful information and advice you can share!
Site and Policy » Featured Image » Post 6
I throw this in the ring:
Site and Policy » Featured Image » Post 5
Background Pony #F7CC
Older but remarkable:
Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 205
Background Pony #EB0A
@BigBuggyBastage
Do they have GMail or no?
Do they have GMail or no?
Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 203
Background Pony #EB0A
@Scarlet Ribbon
Oh okay, so what I must I do about the e-mail then?
Oh okay, so what I must I do about the e-mail then?
Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 202
@Background Pony #EB0A
Philomena is the underlying software Derpibooru and Tantabus run on.
Philomena is the underlying software Derpibooru and Tantabus run on.
Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 201
Background Pony #EB0A
@Background Pony #0268
What’s Philomena?
What’s Philomena?
Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 200
Background Pony #0268
@Background Pony #A06F @Background Pony #EB0A
I wonder if this is related to the issues going on with ponybooru. (both use philomena)
I wonder if this is related to the issues going on with ponybooru. (both use philomena)
Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 199
Background Pony #EB0A
@Admin
I didn’t get an e-mail confirmation on my Gmail when I registered. Please help.
I didn’t get an e-mail confirmation on my Gmail when I registered. Please help.
Site and Policy » Opening Thread » Post 198
Background Pony #A06F
I didn’t get an e-mail confirmation on my Gmail when I registered. Please help.
Site and Policy » [Extension] Tantabus Tagging Assistant » Post 5
FYI, added configurable presets to the editor. Works pretty similar to profiles, but works only with tag editor during image upload or when editing tags. You can click to add/remove specific tags or add/remove the whole preset at once.
Update is already out for Firefox.
Site and Policy » New name for the combined Artist+Prompter tag. » Post 22
I like
by: because it’s short and gives more visual space for the person’s name. Otherwise author and creator both sound goodSite and Policy » New name for the combined Artist+Prompter tag. » Post 21
id prefer the booru standard of
artist but i don’t think they like the idea of dealing the potential upset antis. prompter is stupid because it only implies prompting and not any of the other work done. otherwise by: would be best. as it is the most neutral, doesn’t degrade and doesn’t sound tacky.Site and Policy » New name for the combined Artist+Prompter tag. » Post 20
I’m fine withcreatorbut I also believe we should just be tagging ourselves asartist. The world already has enough disrespect for what we do, I don’t see why we need join in.I juggle 4-5 models on a single txt2img pass. With the same I prompt I can range anywhere from show accurate to photorealism by deciding which models to use, which model does what, and tweaking denoise ratios.Might also be a good idea to remember theai generated,ai assisted, andai compositiontags. I usually tag my stuff withai generatedbut that’s really just a technicality because reForge is automating all the inpainting.
Agree,
artist: really makes the most sense. We don’t need to validate the anti- ideas about AI art not being art.Site and Policy » [Extension] Tantabus Tagging Assistant » Post 4
Something like a list of named presets you can click to add (or remove) all the tags in them right into the editor? I think I can make something like that.
Site and Policy » [Extension] Tantabus Tagging Assistant » Post 3
I’ve tested it out, works pretty well. However, I would like to have an ability to quickly add my saved tags to images during image upload and tag editing processes.
Site and Policy » [Extension] Tantabus Tagging Assistant » Post 2
Mozilla completed the review for extension: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tantabus-tagging-assistant/
Site and Policy » New name for the combined Artist+Prompter tag. » Post 19
i don’t know what to answer, I put on Gemini to see his opinion to help me think and returned it:
Creator: It’s incredibly universal and inclusive. Whether someone is physically drawing an image from scratch or carefully crafting a prompt to generate it, they are bringing a new concept to life. It respects both traditional and AI workflows without alienating either side.
Prompter: This feels entirely specific to AI. If a traditional artist posts their work, being labeled just a "prompter" might feel dismissive of their manual effort.
Director: This sounds a bit too cinematic, hahaha. While it accurately describes guiding an AI, it implies managing a team or a movie set rather than crafting a standalone image.
Producer: Similar to Director, it feels a little too industrial or business-focused.
By: It's straightforward, but maybe a little too vague for a structured database or image board. Creator: [Name] looks much cleaner and more professional in a tag list than By: [Name].
If you wanted to look completely outside the list, Author: could also work, but Creator: still feels like the most natural and respectful choice for visual media. It sits perfectly alongside the Editor: tag, too!
This context helped me to think better on the subject, and my conclusion that I had is that “Creator” seems more interesting.
It demonstrates that although you have used AI, the use was to create something new, and not to generate an image without any creative way. The idea is to highlight: I used AI to create this project that represents something much deeper from my ideas.
Site and Policy » [Extension] Tantabus Tagging Assistant » Post 1
Looks interesting, I will wait for the Firefox version.
Showing results 1 - 25 of 368 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
Allowed fields
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |

