Posts
Search Results
Creative Corner » Liquid Rainbow Effect » Post 2
@Background Pony #549D
They are โuploadedโ, in a sense. If you open them in a new tab and download them, you get the 720p version. Same as on my hard drive. I donโt directly upload them to tantabus because, as they are (raw), they donโt meet my personal standards.
They are โuploadedโ, in a sense. If you open them in a new tab and download them, you get the 720p version. Same as on my hard drive. I donโt directly upload them to tantabus because, as they are (raw), they donโt meet my personal standards.
Creative Corner » Liquid Rainbow Effect » Post 1
Background Pony #549D
Please upload those โraw examplesโ. They still stand out from typical Tantabus uploads.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 202
Background Pony #635A
Please alias on cloud into on a cloud.
And lying on a cloud should imply on a cloud.
Glory (g5) should be marked as a canon character.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 11
@CCDrop
Generally, tagging an absence of something isnโt needed because you can search with negation. Searching for -crotchboobs would search for anything without crotchboobs. Exceptions are made, but they are just that: exceptions.
I donโt want things with just crotchboobs though that misses the point. Since any position where you canโt naturally see them itโs not an issue. Since itโs not the absence of crotchboobs thatโs the issue per se itโs the absence of them when they should be there. Since really a proper tag for this would probably be mastectomy since thatโs why itโs so off putting is itโs like looking a castration or penectomy image since thereโs a natural structure that should be there thatโs not.
So for example I wouldnโt want to have to search balls just because I donโt want to see castration I just donโt want to see castration so I hide castration and thatโs what I want here. I donโt care if I see crotchboobs I just donโt want to see mastectomy or whatever tag makes the most sense to start using.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 10
@CCDrop
Generally, tagging an absence of something isnโt needed because you can search with negation. Searching for -crotchboobs would search for anything without crotchboobs. Exceptions are made, but they are just that: exceptions.
Generally, tagging an absence of something isnโt needed because you can search with negation. Searching for -crotchboobs would search for anything without crotchboobs. Exceptions are made, but they are just that: exceptions.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 200
Both should be character tags.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 199
Background Pony #635A
Please alias on cloud into on a cloud.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 9
So one thing Iโve always wished I could filter by, but thereโs no tag for it is crotchboobless for images where you can clearly see the crotch on a feral pony and thereโs no boobs. I donโt care if thereโs human vulva on pony which is where 80% of these kinds of images come from just as long as the boobs are present in the correct place.
So I was wondering whatโs the policy for new tags and would it be alright if I started tagging things as crotchboobless or something more politically correct?
I feel like on a politically correct side it would be to start tagging them all as anatomically incorrect but also looking at the content of that tagโฆ I feel like it would be too harsh even if technically true, since I feel like the anatomically incorrect tag is a good general filter tag to avoid truly messed up anatomy, where as really crotchbooblessness is just kind of its own unique fetish.
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 197
Added the ship:pinkiesentry tag. According to Derpibooru, it implies:
female, g4, male, pinkie pie, shipping, straight, flash sentry
Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 195
โQuestionable consentโ and โdubconโ should be aliased to โdubious consentโ.
General Discussion » Chat Thread » Post 2
Background Pony #1ED5
@Background Pony #7DE6
If its cartoon/anime look first at the line-work. AI is all over the place most of the time.
Then at shadows, the background or hands. Do the shadows make sense in relation to the light source? Are stupid weird object in the background? Are the hands symmetrical? Same finger length + thickness? Are the nails in the same style?
Stuff like that.
If its cartoon/anime look first at the line-work. AI is all over the place most of the time.
Then at shadows, the background or hands. Do the shadows make sense in relation to the light source? Are stupid weird object in the background? Are the hands symmetrical? Same finger length + thickness? Are the nails in the same style?
Stuff like that.
Creative Corner » Liquid Rainbow Effect » Topic Opener
Liquid Rainbow
Foreword
So, around a week ago I started playing around with Illustrious. And coming from PonyV6, I fast learned that it can be a lot more โcreativeโ. Yes, a PonyV6 models knows ponies better, but Illustrious, in my opinion, knows more โconceptsโ. As I do with new toys, I played around and found the effect mentioned in the title:
Resources
We need 3 things:
- An Illustrious model. I worked with this one. But I tested it with this one, too. Both work, for others you have to try yourself.
- The โVelvetโs Mythic Fantasy Stylesโ Lora in version 2 for illustrious. (This Lora is for a detailed anime style. Any Lora adding detail could work, I like this one.)
- The โLeIsT0 | Shiiroโs Stylesโ Lora. (This one helps making the colors โpopโ.)
The Prompt
The prompt for the Twilight picture looked something like this:
QUALITY WORDS, 1pony, my little pony, pony, feral pony, unicorn, Twilight Sparkle, casting magic at viewer, shiny fur, limited palette, (glow, liquid glowing magic, glowing liquid purple magic)++, intense expression, dramatic lighting, strong depth of field, wind-blown hair, gritty realism, cinematic shot, dutch angle, (simple background, black background)++, dust particles, dynamic pose, dynamic composition, foreshortening, blurry edges, MORE QUALITY WORDS
Some may be confused about the โ++โ signs. I work with Invoke, which takes โ-โ and โ+โ signs as weights. A โ++โ is around 1.2. So if you use a different UI, you will have to try around a little. The important parts are
simple background, black background
for the mat black background to play with. If I lowered the weights, the loras added stuff into it.The effect itself is achieved with
limited palette, dramatic lighting, glow, liquid glowing magic, glowing liquid purple magic
. Limited palette makes the AI use as few colors as possible, what is then overridden by the โpurple magicโ part with a higher weight. Muting any other color beside the one mentioned. If you replace โpurpleโ with โrainbowโ, you get the colors of the rainbow. Easy.Now the lora weights. I used both with good results at 0.8. The trigger words are not in the prompt since Invoke has its own way to add loras that doesnโt need them. If you add a lora, it gets activated, thatโs it. You find the trigger words on the civitai page.
I used Euler A at 25 steps with a CFG around 7 for all the pictures here.
That should be it, really. Have fun!
Important
The more in detail you describe the character in the prompt, the more detail gets added, and with that: color. If you want good โshade playโ be as brief as possible. (Thatโs why it works better with known characters since you only have to add their name most of the time.)
More Examples
A few more raw examples:


Side Note
If you use the Fantasy Lora at 0.8-1.0 and the โLeIsT0โ Lora at 1, with โlimited paletteโ and no rainbow liquid you get this comic looking style:
If you use the Fantasy Lora at 0.8-1.0 and the โLeIsT0โ Lora at 1, with โlimited paletteโ and no rainbow liquid you get this comic looking style:
Showing results 1 - 18 of 18 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization
, wings
, and spread wings
would all be found by a search for wing
, but sewing
would not be.
Allowed fields
Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |