Registrations up again - Apologies for the interruption, signups should work again

Posts

For more information, see the search syntax documentation. Search results are sorted by creation date.

Search Results

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 204

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 203

Creative Corner » Liquid Rainbow Effect » Post 2

Creative Corner » Liquid Rainbow Effect » Post 1

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 202

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 201

Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 11

@CCDrop
Generally, tagging an absence of something isnโ€™t needed because you can search with negation. Searching for -crotchboobs would search for anything without crotchboobs. Exceptions are made, but they are just that: exceptions.
I donโ€™t want things with just crotchboobs though that misses the point. Since any position where you canโ€™t naturally see them itโ€™s not an issue. Since itโ€™s not the absence of crotchboobs thatโ€™s the issue per se itโ€™s the absence of them when they should be there. Since really a proper tag for this would probably be mastectomy since thatโ€™s why itโ€™s so off putting is itโ€™s like looking a castration or penectomy image since thereโ€™s a natural structure that should be there thatโ€™s not.
So for example I wouldnโ€™t want to have to search balls just because I donโ€™t want to see castration I just donโ€™t want to see castration so I hide castration and thatโ€™s what I want here. I donโ€™t care if I see crotchboobs I just donโ€™t want to see mastectomy or whatever tag makes the most sense to start using.

Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 10

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 200

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 199

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 198

Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 9

So one thing Iโ€™ve always wished I could filter by, but thereโ€™s no tag for it is crotchboobless for images where you can clearly see the crotch on a feral pony and thereโ€™s no boobs. I donโ€™t care if thereโ€™s human vulva on pony which is where 80% of these kinds of images come from just as long as the boobs are present in the correct place.
So I was wondering whatโ€™s the policy for new tags and would it be alright if I started tagging things as crotchboobless or something more politically correct?
I feel like on a politically correct side it would be to start tagging them all as anatomically incorrect but also looking at the content of that tagโ€ฆ I feel like it would be too harsh even if technically true, since I feel like the anatomically incorrect tag is a good general filter tag to avoid truly messed up anatomy, where as really crotchbooblessness is just kind of its own unique fetish.

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 197

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 196

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 195

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 194

General Discussion » Chat Thread » Post 2

Background Pony #1ED5
@Background Pony #7DE6
If its cartoon/anime look first at the line-work. AI is all over the place most of the time.
Then at shadows, the background or hands. Do the shadows make sense in relation to the light source? Are stupid weird object in the background? Are the hands symmetrical? Same finger length + thickness? Are the nails in the same style?
Stuff like that.

Creative Corner » Liquid Rainbow Effect » Topic Opener

truekry

Wizzard

Liquid Rainbow

Foreword
So, around a week ago I started playing around with Illustrious. And coming from PonyV6, I fast learned that it can be a lot more โ€œcreativeโ€. Yes, a PonyV6 models knows ponies better, but Illustrious, in my opinion, knows more โ€œconceptsโ€. As I do with new toys, I played around and found the effect mentioned in the title:
Resources
We need 3 things:
  • An Illustrious model. I worked with this one. But I tested it with this one, too. Both work, for others you have to try yourself.
  • The โ€œVelvetโ€™s Mythic Fantasy Stylesโ€ Lora in version 2 for illustrious. (This Lora is for a detailed anime style. Any Lora adding detail could work, I like this one.)
  • The โ€œLeIsT0 | Shiiroโ€™s Stylesโ€ Lora. (This one helps making the colors โ€œpopโ€.)
The Prompt
The prompt for the Twilight picture looked something like this:
QUALITY WORDS, 1pony, my little pony, pony, feral pony, unicorn, Twilight Sparkle, casting magic at viewer, shiny fur, limited palette, (glow, liquid glowing magic, glowing liquid purple magic)++, intense expression, dramatic lighting, strong depth of field, wind-blown hair, gritty realism, cinematic shot, dutch angle, (simple background, black background)++, dust particles, dynamic pose, dynamic composition, foreshortening, blurry edges, MORE QUALITY WORDS
Some may be confused about the โ€œ++โ€ signs. I work with Invoke, which takes โ€œ-โ€ and โ€œ+โ€ signs as weights. A โ€œ++โ€ is around 1.2. So if you use a different UI, you will have to try around a little. The important parts are simple background, black background for the mat black background to play with. If I lowered the weights, the loras added stuff into it.
The effect itself is achieved with limited palette, dramatic lighting, glow, liquid glowing magic, glowing liquid purple magic. Limited palette makes the AI use as few colors as possible, what is then overridden by the โ€œpurple magicโ€ part with a higher weight. Muting any other color beside the one mentioned. If you replace โ€œpurpleโ€ with โ€œrainbowโ€, you get the colors of the rainbow. Easy.
Now the lora weights. I used both with good results at 0.8. The trigger words are not in the prompt since Invoke has its own way to add loras that doesnโ€™t need them. If you add a lora, it gets activated, thatโ€™s it. You find the trigger words on the civitai page.
I used Euler A at 25 steps with a CFG around 7 for all the pictures here.
That should be it, really. Have fun!
Important
The more in detail you describe the character in the prompt, the more detail gets added, and with that: color. If you want good โ€œshade playโ€ be as brief as possible. (Thatโ€™s why it works better with known characters since you only have to add their name most of the time.)
More Examples
A few more raw examples:

Side Note
If you use the Fantasy Lora at 0.8-1.0 and the โ€œLeIsT0โ€ Lora at 1, with โ€˜limited paletteโ€™ and no rainbow liquid you get this comic looking style:

Default search

If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.

Allowed fields

Field SelectorTypeDescriptionExample
authorLiteralMatches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term.author:Joey
bodyFull TextMatches the body of this post. This is the default field.body:test
created_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation time of this post.created_at:2015
idNumeric RangeMatches the numeric surrogate key for this post.id:1000000
myMetamy:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. my:posts
subjectFull TextMatches the title of the topic.subject:time wasting thread
topic_idLiteralMatches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to.topic_id:7000
topic_positionNumeric RangeMatches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0.topic_position:0
updated_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation or last edit time of this post.updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago
user_idLiteralMatches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term.user_id:211190
forumLiteralMatches the short name for the forum this post belongs to.forum:meta