Posts

For more information, see the search syntax documentation. Search results are sorted by creation date.

Search Results

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 384

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 383

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 382

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 381

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 380

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 379

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 378

LightningBolt

Administrator
ADHD fueled
Have you even seen the situation of gender tagging on this site? If not for like a few people making sure female is tagged, it wouldn’t be at all, and you’re expecting people to do things like this?
Also m to be mare and s to be stallion is not only very unintuitive (m is male, it’s just how it is) but also species centric.
Sometimes I think people expect more from the tag system than it even has.
Sorry I’m not doing any actual tag additions/fixes lately and just bitching, just really busy, and bitching doesn’t take time and effort…

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 377

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 376

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 375

Background Pony #635A
@dergness
@Background Pony #3EFB
At this rate y’all are gonna learn regex just to peel your banana more efficiently.
Personally I’d prefer m to mean mare, and s to mean stallion, but that’s just a side note.
You have to account for >no hooves. Antro, humanized, EQG (ugh), dragons, griffons, other non-horse characters…

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 374

It would be much more convenient for searching if one gender in the tag was consistently on the right and the other on the left. This consistent positioning of genders unlocks flexible search options:
*mf *some - for any number of males
mf* *some - for any number of females
*mf* *some - for any combination where both genders are present
f* *some - for any number of females only
*m *some - for any number of males only
I see your point, but it’s still possible currently too.
*mf *some - for any number of males
*fm *some - for any number of females
(*mf* *some || *fm* *some), or simply *some, male, female - for any combination where both genders are present
f*f *some - for any number of females only
m*m *some - for any number of males only
This way (most appearing comes first) is at least easier than opening the decision which gender is better and has to be ordered where…
Personally I’d prefer m to mean mare, and s to mean stallion, but that’s just a side note.

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 373

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 372

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 371

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 370

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 369

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 368

Background Pony #3EFB
It would be much more convenient for searching if one gender in the tag was consistently on the right and the other on the left. This consistent positioning of genders unlocks flexible search options:
*mf × N *some - for any number of males
N × mf* *some - for any number of females
*mf* *some - for any combination where both genders are present
f* *some - for any number of females only
*m *some - for any number of males only

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 367

Background Pony #356F
Missing implications:
milk squirt, leaking milk -> lactation
Merge tags:
lactating -> lactation

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 366

Also got another one,
the threesome foursome etc. tags, with the f/m specifications.
Examples:
  • fff threesome -> threesome (adds group sex), lesbian (adds female)
    mmf threesome -> threesome (adds group sex), multiple males (adds male), single female (adds female), gangbang (not sure if this is too “dangerous” to add automatically)
  • ffm threesome -> threesome (adds group sex), multiple females (adds male), single male (adds female)
  • mmm threesome -> threesome (adds group sex), gay (adds male); this was not existent at time of writing, but if possible it would make sense to alias in preparation.
Notes:
  • I might recommend not the perfect tags to add for a tag, so improvements, clarifications and discussions are well welcome.
  • I’ve seen them constructed by taking the one being more to go first, then the single other party going last.
    fffff + m + {N}some
  • In general I believe that those make tagging group sex counts easier, too.
    i.e. it’s easier to count the 5 dicks, then type mmmmm, then add f and have the sixsome be completed automatically.
  • It currently is only missing the {N}some implications, and possibly tags based on the f/m distribution.
  • 9/ninesome seems to be the current
  • I see the following cases:
    1. Females vs single male (X × f + m) - mostly ffm threesome for cock licking stuff.
    2. Males vs single mare (Y × m + f) - Zebras~ ’Nuff said~
    3. Same-gender combinations (Z × f/m) - Lesbian / Gay.
  • quantities:
    1. solo
    2. duo
    3. threesome
    4. foursome
    5. fivesome
    6. sixsome
    7. sevensome
    8. eightsome
    9. ninesome
    10. tensome (not to be confused with handsome)
    11. elevensome
  • Tag search: * *some
    Some noticeable additions:
    • cmc threesome shall imply fff threesome
    • cmc+m foursome shall imply cmc foursome and fffm foursome
    • cmc foursome shall imply foursome (other gender unknown) and cmc
    • mmff foursome shall imply multiple females and multiple males, as well as foursome as usual
  • Lunabooru currently has up to 9-some.
  • Derpibooru currently has up to 11-some.

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 365

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 364

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 363

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 362

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 361

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 360

Default search

If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.

Allowed fields

Field SelectorTypeDescriptionExample
authorLiteralMatches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term.author:Joey
bodyFull TextMatches the body of this post. This is the default field.body:test
created_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation time of this post.created_at:2015
idNumeric RangeMatches the numeric surrogate key for this post.id:1000000
myMetamy:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. my:posts
subjectFull TextMatches the title of the topic.subject:time wasting thread
topic_idLiteralMatches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to.topic_id:7000
topic_positionNumeric RangeMatches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0.topic_position:0
updated_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation or last edit time of this post.updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago
user_idLiteralMatches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term.user_id:211190
forumLiteralMatches the short name for the forum this post belongs to.forum:meta