If someone is using Bing, then I agree tagging
generator:bing image creator
is useful. But which generator MicroSoft is leveraging behind the scenes will be something that will change with time. So that implication will need to be maintained, and will not always be right for all Bing-generated images that are uploaded - especially during transitional periods.
In particular, I’m concerned about the timeliness and maintenance of having
generator:bing image creator
imply an individual version of Dall-E, assuming everyone accessing Bing is getting the same core technology.
And there are several ‘generators’ which, like Bing, are really just UIs that are leveraging something else behind the scenes.
Would that information be better expressed in the description of the top tag? For example, adding a description to
generator:bing image creator
that says that as of December 2024, Bing is using DALL-E 3 model PR16, rather than an implication pointing to DALL-E 3? Then when it changes in the future the new information could be added with the corresponding dates?