Tantabus
Filters (Default) SettingsRegisterLogin

Posts

For more information, see the search syntax documentation. Search results are sorted by creation date.

Search Results

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 69

Nocturn

Moderator
Adjutant
@tyto4tme4l
I did bing -> generator:bing image creator
If someone is using Bing, then I agree tagging generator:bing image creator is useful. But which generator MicroSoft is leveraging behind the scenes will be something that will change with time. So that implication will need to be maintained, and will not always be right for all Bing-generated images that are uploaded - especially during transitional periods.
In particular, I’m concerned about the timeliness and maintenance of having generator:bing image creator imply an individual version of Dall-E, assuming everyone accessing Bing is getting the same core technology.
And there are several ‘generators’ which, like Bing, are really just UIs that are leveraging something else behind the scenes.
Would that information be better expressed in the description of the top tag? For example, adding a description to generator:bing image creator that says that as of December 2024, Bing is using DALL-E 3 model PR16, rather than an implication pointing to DALL-E 3? Then when it changes in the future the new information could be added with the corresponding dates?
Posted Report

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 68

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 67

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 66

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 65

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 64

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 63

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 62

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 61

Thoryn

Latter Liaison
hair bow, hair ribbonand flower in hair should imply hair ornament (ornament = decorative)
hairband should imply hair accessory (practical, though may also be decorative)
Really though, the whole thing can become a bit of a clusterfuck with gray areas for defining things, because nothing can ever be simple.
Edit: sisters and brothers should imply siblings
PS: Even in case of adoption, it still counts as being siblings legally speaking, it’s not just the biological factor.
PPS: Would not be surprised if it does vary depending on jurisdiction, because again, why would anything be simple.

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 60

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 59

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 58

Thoryn

Latter Liaison
apple bloom should maybe imply hair bow?
Sure, she can be without it, but 99% (number pulled out of my ass) of the images, it’s there.
For Twilight Sparkle
twilight sparkle (alicorn) makes sense, name followed by race/kind is logical. (no link, couldn’t escape the () properly..)
unicorn twilight however uses it the complete opposite, and doesn’t even use the full name..
Posted Report

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 57

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 56

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 55

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 54

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 53

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 52

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 51

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 50

Background Pony #BBCC
@Thoryn
Do you think they don’t get humanized or species swapped too much for it to be worth the trouble?
Posted Report

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 49

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 48

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 47

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 46

Tagging Discussion » General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread » Post 45

Showing results 26 - 50 of 95 total

Default search

If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.

Allowed fields

Field SelectorTypeDescriptionExample
authorLiteralMatches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term.author:Joey
bodyFull TextMatches the body of this post. This is the default field.body:test
created_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation time of this post.created_at:2015
idNumeric RangeMatches the numeric surrogate key for this post.id:1000000
myMetamy:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. my:posts
subjectFull TextMatches the title of the topic.subject:time wasting thread
topic_idLiteralMatches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to.topic_id:7000
topic_positionNumeric RangeMatches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0.topic_position:0
updated_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation or last edit time of this post.updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago
user_idLiteralMatches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term.user_id:211190
forumLiteralMatches the short name for the forum this post belongs to.forum:meta