I think “ai generated” as an implication should be removed from “generator:zoinksnoob”, since a picture can be an “ai composition” instead of “ai generated”.

“Stetson” should imply “Cowboy Hat”

@Draco Dei
Unless the image itself depicts it, don’t bother.

Looks interesting, I will wait for the Firefox version.

I’d like to present you my tiny browser extension. Now ported for Tantabus!

This is the main feature I was made this extension for. You can set up the list of tags you want to quickly add to or remove from the images. Then you can just hover over each individual image in the search results and click on what you want to add or remove.

This feature will only work for authorized users, since anonymous users should pass captcha to edit the tags.

You can create your own custom groups of tags, color them with one of the existing category colors and even split them from the rest of the tags under the title.

You can also poke around the source code in this GitHub repository:

It’s a huge mess of TypeScript, SvelteKit and a bunch of build scripts I’ve created to glue everything up together.

@Background Pony #635A
Done.

white background = wb

Derpi uses this alias.

I’m fine with creator but I also believe we should just be tagging ourselves as artist. The world already has enough disrespect for what we do, I don’t see why we need join in.

I juggle 4-5 models on a single txt2img pass. With the same I prompt I can range anywhere from show accurate to photorealism by deciding which models to use, which model does what, and tweaking denoise ratios.

Might also be a good idea to remember the ai generated, ai assisted, and ai composition tags. I usually tag my stuff with ai generated but that’s really just a technicality because reForge is automating all the inpainting.

Could one append the word “adoptive” to the beginning of such tags and that would be acceptable? At least in cases where it is both clear(a) and not spammy(b)? Maybe only images where the relationship is shawcased and clear (or the tag vague such as “adoptive family”).
(a) While Spike is pretty clearly family to Twilight, “brother”, “son”, and “indefinable” are all options for what sort of adoptive relationship it is.
(b) Tagging every appearance of Cadance with either of the diarchs with “adoptive aunt and niece” seems like it COULD be a bit repetitive/redundant and still more for images of Cadance without either of the diarchs?

creator is the most encompassing imo, director is a good alternative. by sounds weird as it goes against noun:value scheme that other tags use (generator:*, ship:*, oc:*)