Schrodinger's/Ambiguous Characters

Poll results: Tagging

Keep "Schodinger's Spyro".
0% 0 votes
Remove "Schodinger's Spyro".
0% 0 votes
Keep "Schodinger's character" in existence in general.
0% 0 votes
Keep "ambiguous character" in existence in general.
0% 0 votes
Don't use either of the above tags at all.
0% 0 votes
If keeping both, make "Schodinger's character" the official tag.
0% 0 votes
If keeping both, make "ambiguous character" the official.
0% 0 votes

Poll ends . No votes have been cast so far.


I asked if the character in the background of the last part of this was an older Spyro the Dragon so I could add the tag if appropriate.
Prompter replied that with AI even the prompter can’t be sure of such things, but that they preferred to think it was a different Dragon. I responded by tagging it “Schrodinger’s Character” and “Schrodinger’s Spyro”. Are either or both of these good tags to have? Should the first one be an alias of or to an “ambiguous character” tag which is probably easier to remember and definitely easier to spell, but not nearly as evocative.
Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ ~sub~

Detailed syntax guide