Description

Image imported from Derpibooru.
Original: https://derpibooru.org/images/2958317
Metadata at the time of import:
Field Data
Favorites 33
Upvotes 66
Downvotes 8
Score 58
Comments 10
Uploader Hazy Skies
Original description below this line

25.5 cute mares all generated via Pony Diffusion (Pony fine-tuned Stable Diffusion)
Prompt: Anon Filly smiling, Vivid green pony with jet black hair, fluffy, countershading, cute, vibrant cinematic lighting, trending on artstation, professional pony portrait by franz xaver winterhalter sophie anderson

safe17460 ai generated50412 automatically imported33021 derpibooru import33215 generator:stable diffusion23522 oc5713 oc only4844 oc:filly anon110 pony24822 chest fluff2723 collage377 cute5255 ear fluff2683 female49391 filly1421 foal1548 high res3564 looking at you21084 mare15794 multiple angles1 smiling18694 solo38718

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ ~sub~

Detailed syntax guide

Background Pony #695A
Speaking of tags, I’m not all that certain if solo should apply. Each portrait is solo, but because it’s a collage then there isn’t just one pone and thus not solo?
There’s no doubt in my mind that making AI art is real art.
I spent about 1.5 hours tweaking things to produce these visuals!!1
I spent about 30 minutes generating to get all these, which wouldn’t have gotten as good results if it weren’t for modifying a prompt a fellow user was using which allowed for this level of quality with V1.
It seems that specifying specific styles (eg. Vivid cinematic), art platforms (eg. Deviantart, artstation) and artists (eg. Artgerm) seem quite important for achieving the best results, even if the only change is lighting, colour palettes and texture.
I’ve also been using AI for months, so perhaps the increase in speed is just experience with prompting, or maybe I was just lucky with these xD

Imported from Derpibooru - Posted by Hazy Skies